<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LaborWeb Articles</title>
    <link>http://www.arkansasafl-cio.org</link>
    <description>Articles from LaborWeb</description>
    <item>
      <title>Union Advantage By The Numbers</title>
      <link>http://www.arkansasafl-cio.org/index.cfm?action=article&amp;articleID=fdabb0d8-7166-4dcf-b2c3-1f16944c600f</link>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Union workers get more benefits and earn higher wages than workers who dont &#xD;
have a voice on the job with a union.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &#xD;
Union workers participating in job-provided health insurance  79% &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Nonunion workers participating in job-provided health insurance  52% &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;b&gt;Union workers are &lt;font color="red"&gt;52 percent&lt;/font&gt; more likely than nonunion workers  &#xD;
to have job-provided health care &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;hr&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Union workers without health insurance coverage  2.5% &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Nonunion workers without health insurance coverage  15% &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;b&gt;Nonunion workers are &lt;font color="red"&gt;five times&lt;/font&gt; more likely to lack health insurance coverage &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;hr&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Union workers participating in guaranteed (defined-benefit) pension plans  77% &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Nonunion workers participating in guaranteed (defined-benefit) pension plans  20% &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;b&gt;Union workers are &lt;font color="red"&gt;285 percent&lt;/font&gt; (nearly three times) more likely than  &#xD;
nonunion workers to have defined-benefit pensions &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;hr&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Union workers with paid personal leave 57% &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Nonunion workers with paid personal leave 38% &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;b&gt;Union workers are &lt;font color="red"&gt;50 percent&lt;/font&gt; more likely than nonunion workers  &#xD;
to have paid personal leave &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;hr&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Union workers average days of paid vacation 15 days &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Nonunion workers average days of paid vacation 11.75 days &lt;br&gt; &#xD;
&lt;b&gt;Union paid vacation advantage &lt;font color="red"&gt;28% &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;hr&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Union workers median weekly earnings  $886 &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Nonunion workers median weekly earnings  $691 &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;b&gt;Union wage advantage  &lt;font color="red"&gt;28%&lt;/font&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;hr&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Union womens median weekly earnings  $809 &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Nonunion womens median weekly earnings  $615 &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;b&gt;Union wage advantage for women  &lt;font color="red"&gt;32%&lt;/font&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;hr&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
African American union workers median weekly earnings  $720 &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
African American nonunion workers median weekly earnings  $564 &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;b&gt;Union wage advantage for African Americans  &lt;font color="red"&gt;28%&lt;/font&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;hr&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Latino union workers median weekly earnings  $733 &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Latino nonunion workers median weekly earnings  $512 &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;b&gt;Union wage advantage for Latinos  &lt;font color="red"&gt;43%&lt;/font&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;hr&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Asian American union workers median weekly earnings  $902 &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Asian American nonunion workers median weekly earnings  $852 &lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;b&gt;Union wage advantage for Asian Americans &lt;font color="red"&gt;6%&lt;/font&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;hr&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Sources: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, &lt;i&gt;Union Members in 2008&lt;/i&gt;, Jan. 28, 2009; U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor &#xD;
Statistics, &lt;i&gt;National Compensation Survey: Employee Benefits in Private Industry in the United States, March 2008,&lt;/i&gt; August 2008; Economic Policy Institute;  &#xD;
Employee Benefits Research Institute, May 2005.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Report Shows Positive Effect Unions have on Arkansas and the Economy</title>
      <link>http://www.arkansasafl-cio.org/index.cfm?action=article&amp;articleID=5779e1d4-41b9-4b35-b836-83a81c5d3065</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A new report just released from the &lt;em&gt;Center for American Progress &lt;/em&gt;talks about the economic benefits of unions in Arkansas. Union members in Arkansas and across the country earn significantly more than non-union workers. Over the four-year period between 2004 and 2007, unionized workers wages in Arkansas were on average 7.7 percent higher than non-union workers with similar characteristics. That means that, all else equal, Arkansas workers that join a union will earn 7.7 percent moreor $1.26 more per hour in 2008 dollarsthan their otherwise identical non-union counterparts. &#xD;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://images2.americanprogress.org/CAPAF/2009/02/AR_EFCA.pdf"&gt;Read the CAP report with Arkansas-specific data. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Report Shows Unionization Substantially Improves the Pay and Benefits of Younger Workers</title>
      <link>http://www.arkansasafl-cio.org/index.cfm?action=article&amp;articleID=6882b17f-f278-455c-b127-39cd7129185d</link>
      <description>A new report by the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) documents a large wage and benefit advantage for young workers in unions relative to their non-union counterparts. The report also finds that younger workers are earning about 10 percent less than their counterparts did in 1979, despite impressive gains in young workers' educational attainment over the same time period.&#xD;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
"Even though they've done everything right - finished high school and college at higher rates than in the past, young workers have been the hardest hit by stagnant and declining wages over the last 30 years" said John Schmitt, a Senior Economist at CEPR and the author of the study.&#xD;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
The report, "&lt;a href="http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/2008-10-unions-and-upward-mobility-for-young-workers.pdf"&gt;Unions and Upward Mobility for Young Workers&lt;/a&gt;," found that young unionized workers - those age 18 to 29 - earned, on average, 12.4 percent more than their non-union peers. In addition, young workers in unions were much more likely to have health insurance benefits and a pension plan.&#xD;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
The report, which analyzed data from the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey (CPS), found that unionization raises the pay of young workers by about $1.75 per hour. According to the report, young workers in unions were also 17 percentage points more likely to have employer-provided health insurance and 24 percentage points more likely to have an employer-provided pension plan than young workers who were not in unions.&#xD;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
"Unions make a big difference for younger workers," said Schmitt. "There is no economic theory that says young people have to be poorly paid or go without benefits."&#xD;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
According to the study, unionization also strongly benefited young workers in typically low-wage occupations. Among young workers in the 15 lowest-paying occupations, union members earned 10.2 percent more than those workers who were not in unions. In the same low-wage occupations, unionized young people were 27 percentage points more likely to have employer-provided health insurance and 26 percentage points more likely to have a pension plan than their non-union counterparts.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

